From: | Raymond Brinzer <ray(dot)brinzer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Anders Kildemand <AndKil(at)erst(dot)dk>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Question regarding the new SQL standard |
Date: | 2023-10-26 15:46:18 |
Message-ID: | CANasJHkNaxTn6g0rE5-p6tDjEwcFWiOPLPAAdK=jHV5HGZqqEA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I'd like to express my appreciation for a project with a feature set so
extensive that a person might mistakenly assume that its goal was to cover
the spec comprehensively.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Anders Kildemand <AndKil(at)erst(dot)dk> writes:
> > What's the situation with Property Graph Queries in Postgres?
>
> There isn't any.
>
> > I've heard that it has become part of the SQL standard from this blog:
> https://peter.eisentraut.org/blog/2023/04/04/sql-2023-is-finished-here-is-whats-new
> > How far in development is this feature? and is there an expected time
> frame for when it'll be finished?
>
> I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how Postgres
> development works. There is plenty of stuff in the standard that
> nobody has any particular interest in implementing for PG. Perhaps
> someone will take an interest in implementing this feature, or
> perhaps not. But there's no project-wide goal to make it happen,
> much less a timetable. Even if someone does take an interest,
> they might not succeed in producing a committable patch.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
--
Ray Brinzer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Atul Kumar | 2023-10-26 16:51:42 | issue with remote backup |
Previous Message | Ron | 2023-10-26 15:39:00 | Re: Uninstalling Ora2pg |