Re: Question regarding the new SQL standard

I'd like to express my appreciation for a project with a feature set so
extensive that a person might mistakenly assume that its goal was to cover
the spec comprehensively.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Anders Kildemand <AndKil(at)erst(dot)dk> writes:
> > What's the situation with Property Graph Queries in Postgres?
>
> There isn't any.
>
> > I've heard that it has become part of the SQL standard from this blog:
> https://peter.eisentraut.org/blog/2023/04/04/sql-2023-is-finished-here-is-whats-new
> > How far in development is this feature? and is there an expected time
> frame for when it'll be finished?
>
> I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how Postgres
> development works. There is plenty of stuff in the standard that
> nobody has any particular interest in implementing for PG. Perhaps
> someone will take an interest in implementing this feature, or
> perhaps not. But there's no project-wide goal to make it happen,
> much less a timetable. Even if someone does take an interest,
> they might not succeed in producing a committable patch.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

--
Ray Brinzer