Re: Unused indexes

From: Rene Romero Benavides <rene(dot)romero(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unused indexes
Date: 2018-12-01 12:42:02
Message-ID: CANaGW09aUboySD4FCC8Py2Df12p1_5vaEqUzt760Xnu3uwoH8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I think your assumption is correct, as long as the statistics collector is
working correctly (I've never seen this not being the case), and the
setting "track_counts" is set to on.

Am Sa., 1. Dez. 2018 um 05:24 Uhr schrieb Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> For indexes that existed before the cluster was last started, and for
> which
> REINDEX hasn't been run on them since the cluster was last started... is
> it
> valid to say that an index has not been used since the cluster was started
> if these three pg_stat_all_indexes fields all have a value of 0?
>
> idx_scan
> idx_tup_read
> idx_tup_fetch
>
> If it matters, the version is 9.6.6.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
>
>

--
El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
Thomas Alva Edison
http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2018-12-01 12:51:13 Re: Unused indexes
Previous Message Ron 2018-12-01 12:37:05 Re: Transition Tables doesn´t have OID