From: | Rene Romero Benavides <rene(dot)romero(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | postgann2020 s <postgann2020(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Suggestion to Monitoring Tool |
Date: | 2020-06-01 00:06:10 |
Message-ID: | CANaGW0-iiKvQevrPdv+qz1cFfFykAxLfeskfohYRAu+y5iRQBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Give pgwatch2 a try:
https://pgwatch.com/
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:46 AM postgann2020 s <postgann2020(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Thanks for your support.
>
> Environment Details:
> OS: RHEL 7.2
> Postgres: 9.5.15
> Master-Slave with Streaming replication
>
> We are planning to implement the monitoring tool for our environment.
>
> Could someone please suggest the Monitoring Tool based on your experience.
>
> We are looking to cover the below areas.
>
> 1. Monitoring metrics and alerting.
> 2. Monitoring events and alerting.
> 3. Consolidate all the PROD DB logs and provide insights on log data.
> 4. logging explain plan and insights on explain plans. (Something like
> store explain plan and compare plans and send alerts on deviations)
> 5. Logging audit data and insights from audit data.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Postgann.
>
--
El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
Thomas Alva Edison
http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2020-06-01 10:02:19 | pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback as a reliable metric for xid consumption ? |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2020-05-29 16:06:34 | Re: Policy function not working (IN parameter not passed) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-06-01 00:29:05 | Re: How to start slave after pg_basebackup. Why min_wal_size and wal_keep_segments are duplicated |
Previous Message | Stefan Keller | 2020-05-31 22:35:21 | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |