From: | Thomas Poty <thomas(dot)poty(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | ioguix(at)free(dot)fr |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: increasing HA |
Date: | 2018-09-05 14:05:40 |
Message-ID: | CAN_ctnhQr7mX6Mvcr=Z+5eGOwMiHXLnYBV9LAbbcgh3bOy3yqQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> OK, so either patch PAF yourself (not recommended) or choose something
> else. Note that two other ways are working with Pacemaker:
> * the pgsql resource agent (see FAQ of PAF)
> * a shared disk architecture (no pgsql replication)
Probably, i will be interested by the solution "patroni-etcd-haproxy" you
suggested
> I suppose you could find fencing agents for:
> * the blade itself, but it would fence all the container running on it
> * the access to the SAN from the failing container
> I don't know if fencing agent exists for a container itself. Note that
I'm not
> familiar with the container world, I lack a lot of knowledge on this
> technology.
I am not familiar with this too. I heard that for the first time few days
ago by reading how to improve HA ... :-)
Many thanks for your opinions/advices
Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 15:44, Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais <
ioguix(at)free(dot)fr> a écrit :
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:06:21 +0200
> Thomas Poty <thomas(dot)poty(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > In fact, PAF does not support slots. So it is not a good candidate if
> > > slot are a requirement.
> > Effectively slots are a requirement we prefer to keep
>
> OK, so either patch PAF yourself (not recommended) or choose something
> else. Note that two other ways are working with Pacemaker:
> * the pgsql resource agent (see FAQ of PAF)
> * a shared disk architecture (no pgsql replication)
>
> > > > a proxy HAproxy and
> > > > for fencincg, i am a bit disappointed, i don't know what to do/use
> > > Depend on your hardware or your virtualization technology.
> > Our production cluster (master and slave) runs on LXC container. Each LXC
> > container runs on a HPE Blade Server. The storage is on a SAN 3PAR array.
> > Any advice ?
>
> I suppose you could find fencing agents for:
>
> * the blade itself, but it would fence all the container running on it
> * the access to the SAN from the failing container
>
> I don't know if fencing agent exists for a container itself. Note that I'm
> not
> familiar with the container world, I lack a lot of knowledge on this
> technology.
>
> ++
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gunnlaugur Thor Briem | 2018-09-05 14:06:17 | Re: unaccent(text) fails depending on search_path (WAS: pg_upgrade fails saying function unaccent(text) doesn't exist) |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-09-05 14:00:03 | Re: unaccent(text) fails depending on search_path (WAS: pg_upgrade fails saying function unaccent(text) doesn't exist) |