From: | Thomas Poty <thomas(dot)poty(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Charlin Barak <charlinbarak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Using the public schema |
Date: | 2018-04-24 03:26:22 |
Message-ID: | CAN_ctnhFucCNV15kQgc7Xiq5usnG5semzqyZx3QpVJb0OJ7L3A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Erratum :
The main problem with the public schéma is the default privileges (*create*)
granted to all users able to connect.
Le lun. 23 avr. 2018 à 21:16, Thomas Poty <thomas(dot)poty(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
> Hi charlin,
> I invite you to read this doc it explains very well the security issue
> with the public schéma :
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/A_Guide_to_CVE-2018-1058:_Protect_Your_Search_Path
>
> The main problem with the public schéma is the default privileges
> (execute) granted to all users able to connect.
>
> Personally, each time i create a database, i remove the public schema
>
> Regards
> Thomas
>
> Le lun. 23 avr. 2018 à 17:00, Charlin Barak <charlinbarak(at)gmail(dot)com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>> We will be developing three new applications in PostgreSQL, each having
>> its own database instance running on different hosts. We will only have one
>> schema per Postgres instance. The data is read-write only by one
>> application/schema in the DB instance and the data is published to other
>> applications via API calls.
>>
>> In such a standalone database configuration, are there any security
>> implications or any downsides to creating the application in the public
>> schema?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-04-24 04:10:35 | Re: Strange error in Windows 10 Pro |
Previous Message | Dale Seaburg | 2018-04-24 02:49:04 | Re: Strange error in Windows 10 Pro |