| From: | Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A problem about partitionwise join |
| Date: | 2019-11-29 03:07:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAN_9JTxi=Wqq8g=dQQqjV3eOFaDCZxD5j=TfMXD4BXLPKW=tjg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:03 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 08:35:33PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > I've just started reviewing this patch. One comment I have for now
> > is: this is categorized into Bug Fixes, but we have a workaround at
> > least to the regression test case in the patch (ie, just reorder join
> > clauses), so this seems to me more like an improvement than a bug fix.
>
> Hmm. Agreed. Changed the category and moved to next CF.
>
Thanks Etsuro for the comment and thanks Michael for the change.
Thanks
Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2019-11-29 03:25:45 | Re: libpq sslpassword parameter and callback function |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-29 03:03:05 | Re: A problem about partitionwise join |