| From: | Artem Tomyuk <admin(at)leboutique(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yves Dorfsman <yves(at)zioup(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Testing in AWS, EBS |
| Date: | 2016-05-26 13:00:23 |
| Message-ID: | CANYYVq+8R6GR6Q5T+PrR=3kMttBZ=FwBqCfq9EWM4D0nvaaOcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Yes, the smaller instance you choose - the slower ebs will be.
EBS lives separately from EC2, they are communicating via network. So small
instance = low network bandwidth = poorer disk performance.
But still strong recommendation to pre-warm your ebs in any case,
especially if they created from snapshot.
2016-05-26 15:53 GMT+03:00 Yves Dorfsman <yves(at)zioup(dot)com>:
> On 2016-05-25 19:08, Rayson Ho wrote:
> > Actually, when "EBS-Optimized" is on, then the instance gets dedicated
> > bandwidth to EBS.
>
> Hadn't realised that, thanks.
> Is the EBS bandwidth then somewhat limited depending on the type of
> instance too?
>
> --
> http://yves.zioup.com
> gpg: 4096R/32B0F416
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rayson Ho | 2016-05-26 13:50:23 | Re: Testing in AWS, EBS |
| Previous Message | Yves Dorfsman | 2016-05-26 12:53:07 | Re: Testing in AWS, EBS |