Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets
Date: 2023-12-02 06:51:52
Message-ID: CANWCAZbvCOxtnr5YQutn=Q+KY=2E3QZsieYqP-uLTqh_h-xgxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:06 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm not conveying the problem this is solving -- I'm happy to go
> one more round trying to make it clearer -- but if this is not clear,
> it'd be good to at develop an alternative approach to this before
> withdrawing the patch.

This thread had some lively discussion, but it doesn't seem to have
converged towards consensus, and hasn't had activity since April. That
being the case, maybe it's time to withdraw and reconsider the
approach later?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2023-12-02 07:23:28 Commitfest 2023-11 is almost over
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2023-12-02 06:00:00 Re: Improving asan/ubsan support