From: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Date: | 2024-03-07 05:55:22 |
Message-ID: | CANWCAZb76qEZZ_L=V7M2ByEmeeFqzkoFT27-G+q-RdccOmtFBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 6:59 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > + /* Find the control object in shared memory */
> > + control = handle;
>
> I think it's mostly because of readability; it makes clear that the
> handle should be castable to dsa_pointer and it's a control object. I
> borrowed it from dshash_attach().
I find that a bit strange, but I went ahead and kept it.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:13 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The 0001 patch looks good to me. I have some minor comments:
> +PGFILEDESC = "test_radixtree - test code for src/backend/lib/radixtree.c"
> +
>
> "src/backend/lib/radixtree.c" should be updated to
> "src/include/lib/radixtree.h".
Done.
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/test/modules/test_radixtree/README
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +test_integerset contains unit tests for testing the integer set implementation
> +in src/backend/lib/integerset.c.
> +
> +The tests verify the correctness of the implementation, but they can also be
> +used as a micro-benchmark. If you set the 'intset_test_stats' flag in
> +test_integerset.c, the tests will print extra information about execution time
> +and memory usage.
>
> This file is not updated for test_radixtree. I think we can remove it
> as the test cases in test_radixtree are clear.
Done. I pushed this with a few last-minute cosmetic adjustments. This
has been a very long time coming, but we're finally in the home
stretch!
Already, I see sifaka doesn't like this, and I'm looking now...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2024-03-07 05:59:03 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-03-07 05:54:53 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |