Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound
Date: 2023-10-25 04:08:59
Message-ID: CANWCAZaxhpjzDXQKegRhOMZbMNAtN4qHy-PYv8wUsFPr5oQPcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 9:39 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Cool. Seems we are all in agreement, so committed these. Thanks!

Thank you for getting this across the finish line!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-10-25 04:13:38 Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-10-25 03:40:06 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query