From: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Commitfest 2023-11 has started |
Date: | 2023-11-02 11:46:36 |
Message-ID: | CANWCAZakieUoPTjPuAUBECYfD39HW3u2Rug6A+dri95qdO-4yg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Any new patches will now need to be submitted to the January
commitfest. (Normally we'd give advance notice of that change, but
we're a bit behind this time.)
I have started going through the patch entries looking for out-of-date
statuses and filling in missing author fields. Currently we're at:
Needs review: 210. Waiting on Author: 42. Ready for Committer: 29.
Committed: 55. Withdrawn: 10. Returned with Feedback: 1. Total: 347.
Next week I will also look at patches new to this CF and try to
identify any that could be either committed or returned quickly.
Now is a good time to check if your patch still applies and passes
tests. http://cfbot.cputube.org/ shows 81 patches needing rebase. I
don't know what is usual, but that seems like a pretty large number,
so I won't spam the list requesting rebase on each thread. Instead I
plan to do so on a case-by-case basis where I think a patch has some
momentum and needs a little push.
If you have submitted a patch this cycle and have not yet reviewed a
patch, we encourage you to sign up to do so. If you actively
reviewing, we are grateful! We perennially have plenty of code, but a
shortage of good review.
--
John Naylor
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2023-11-02 12:02:12 | Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-11-02 11:30:55 | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |