| From: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? |
| Date: | 2025-01-29 07:02:59 |
| Message-ID: | CANWCAZai=YQNV_VY6tt=pL2RquU2NNr2WQbuj3G8hYeJBeGyyA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 8:52 AM Anton A. Melnikov
<a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 22.01.2025 11:37, John Naylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 4:50 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It would be a lot more readable to revert the offending commit
> >> instead, since its predecessor had a much simpler bytewise loop.
>
> Agreed that reverting seems as a preferable way, and here's why.
This is done -- thanks for the report, and for testing.
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2025-01-29 07:14:26 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2025-01-29 07:01:04 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |