Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2024-04-09 09:22:34
Message-ID: CANWCAZaKjbHbPdoho7Q0F_GQ7JidOHRUnO6OzvBm=HwmAK=uQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:26 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I pushed both of these and see that mylodon complains that anonymous
> unions are a C11 feature. I'm not actually sure that the union with
> uintptr_t is actually needed, though, since that's not accessed as
> such here. The simplest thing seems to get rid if the union and name
> the inner struct "header", as in the attached.

I pushed this with some comment adjustments.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2024-04-09 09:25:06 Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze
Previous Message jian he 2024-04-09 08:44:18 Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints