Re: 回复: An implementation of multi-key sort

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yao Wang <yao-yw(dot)wang(at)broadcom(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Wang Yao <yaowangm(at)outlook(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hongxu Ma <hongxu(dot)ma(at)broadcom(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 回复: An implementation of multi-key sort
Date: 2024-06-20 10:00:03
Message-ID: CANWCAZYwgN19kWeLTgO7c79PXe4-TnPmksEDTaMC=MyZfBU2bA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 6:20 PM Yao Wang <yao-yw(dot)wang(at)broadcom(dot)com> wrote:
>
> hi Tomas,
>
> So many thanks for your kind response and detailed report. I am working
> on locating issues based on your report/script and optimizing code, and
> will update later.

Hi,
This is an interesting proof-of-concept!

Given the above, I've set this CF entry to "waiting on author".

Also, I see you've added Heikki as a reviewer. I'm not sure how others
think, but I consider a "reviewer" in the CF app to be someone who has
volunteered to be responsible to help move this patch forward. If
there is a name in the reviewer column, it may discourage others from
doing review. It also can happened that people ping reviewers to ask
"There's been no review for X months -- are you planning on looking at
this?", and it's not great if that message is a surprise.

Note that we prefer not to top-post in emails since it makes our web
archive more difficult to read.

Thanks,
John

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2024-06-20 10:02:38 How about add counted_by attribute for flexible-array?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-06-20 09:51:29 Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution