Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2024-03-08 01:04:39
Message-ID: CANWCAZYmfEwWd508YwoKPJp=1mfMFKXpQpFAuOikOEdRCrcTfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 11:15 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It looks like it requires a link with pgport_srv but I'm not sure. It
> seems that the recent commit 1f1d73a8b breaks CI, Windows - Server
> 2019, VS 2019 - Meson & ninja, too.

Unfortunately, none of the Windows animals happened to run both after
the initial commit and before removing the (seemingly useless on our
daily platfoms) link. I'll confirm on my own CI branch in a few
minutes.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-03-08 01:08:40 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2024-03-08 01:00:21 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider