Re: PL/java

From: Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2002(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Zé Rui Marques <ze(dot)rui(dot)marques(at)carrotincentives(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/java
Date: 2020-12-07 15:18:57
Message-ID: CANW1aT-9E4qQ_1GG0mujYzZeZZZkU5MFs+tkzHXd5UKitpoHbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like Java is
not meant to interact with databases. Nor is python (in my opinion). I
think you should skip the search

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:15 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 12/7/20 3:25 AM, Zé Rui Marques wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am the lead architect in a small firm that develops a very specialised
> > ETL platform.
> >
> > Traditionally, we have used Oracle and PL-SQL, and we are now porting
> > everything to Postgres.
> >
> > All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that all of
> > our code within the database to be also in java.
> >
> > The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
> >
> > I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official
> > procedural language. If so, when?
>
> None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today it
> would likely a couple of years before it would be included, so that is
> not going to help you. What is your concern?
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > *—*
> > *Zé Rui Marques*
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
>
>

In response to

  • Re: PL/java at 2020-12-07 14:45:38 from Adrian Klaver

Responses

  • Re: PL/java at 2020-12-07 15:25:40 from Adrian Klaver

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2020-12-07 15:25:40 Re: PL/java
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2020-12-07 14:45:38 Re: PL/java