From: | Payal Singh <payal(at)omniti(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Keith Ouellette <Keith(dot)Ouellette(at)airgas(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: archive folder maintenance |
Date: | 2014-01-22 03:49:01 |
Message-ID: | CANUg7LAkmnKkLgZ7PFiAse0Otcr81SORteRYigR=4=JNq_9gdA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Is this a standalone server? What is the value of archive_timeout?
It is generally safe to delete WAL files older than a day or two. More
specifically, all WAL files older than the latest base backup are safe to
selete. A simple bash script will do in this case.
You can also have alook at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/pgarchivecleanup.html tool which
you can straightaway use.
Payal Singh,
OmniTI Computer Consulting Inc.
Junior Database Administrator,
Phone: 240.646.0770 x 253
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Keith Ouellette <Keith(dot)Ouellette(at)airgas(dot)com
> wrote:
> We are running PostgreSQL 9.1 with WAL. I am noticing the archive
> directory just keeps growing. It is currently at 392GB. What is the proper
> maintenance to keep that under control? It does not seem necessary to have
> that much archived. We are doing regular backups (pgdump). Any suggestions.
> The WAL configuration is the following:
>
>
>
> wal_level = hot_standby
>
> archive_mode = on
>
> archive_command = 'cp %p /opt/PostgreSQL/9.1/data/archive/%f'
>
> max_wal_senders = 2
>
> wal_keep_segments = 1000 << I also think this is unnecessary as well
> should be much less in my opinion but shouldn't this deep 1000 16MB WAL
> files or 16GB?
>
>
>
>
>
> Any guidance would be greatly appreciated
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Keith
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith Ouellette | 2014-01-22 13:45:25 | Re: archive folder maintenance |
Previous Message | Keith Ouellette | 2014-01-22 02:16:25 | archive folder maintenance |