Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

From: Bruno Harbulot <bruno(at)distributedmatter(dot)net>
To: Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Date: 2015-05-19 17:45:51
Message-ID: CANPVNBafsFEvncy5J=eRSHsM+9-M5GbJOqrgM=aTmbs4xqUe5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>
wrote:

> A Google search suggests Oracle 9.x supports a unary '?' operator (fuzzy
> match), so the use of '?' in an operator name is not without precedent.
>
>
Interesting. Do you have any specific link? I'm probably not using the
right Google search, but the nearest reference I've found is for Oracle 10,
and it seems to use the tilde (~) operator for fuzzy matching:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/search/oses/overview/new-query-features-in-10-1-8-2-1-132287.pdf

Best wishes,

Bruno.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-05-19 17:49:29 Re: Per row status during INSERT .. ON CONFLICT UPDATE?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-19 17:44:34 Re: a few thoughts on the schedule