Re: pg_upgrade + Ubuntu

From: Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade + Ubuntu
Date: 2015-07-10 19:20:04
Message-ID: CANPAkgvibjoNX6WR3Y-9pbG9UYFZPw95_VGhe=NDbFZS0mzz3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > On 07/10/2015 11:01 AM, Mike Blackwell wrote:
> > >Does pg_config show the correct location?
> > Good idea but:
> >
> > postgres(at)ly19:~$ pg_config
> > You need to install postgresql-server-dev-X.Y for building a server-side
> > extension or libpq-dev for building a client-side application.
> >
> > Which is worse having to install yet another package or having a command
> > line option?
>
> It seems to me that this is a Debian packaging issue, not an upstream
> issue, isn't it? If you want to fix the problem in this way, then
> surely whatever package contains pg_upgrade should also contain
> pg_config.
>
>
​Indeed. An interesting packaging choice. I'd think it belongs to an admin
category along with pg_upgrade, pg_dump, etc., rather than a development
package. Surely it could be useful for admin scripts?

__________________________________________________________________________________
*Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout
Management | RR Donnelley*
1750 Wallace Ave | St Charles, IL 60174-3401
Office: 630.313.7818
Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com
http://www.rrdonnelley.com

​ <http://www.rrdonnelley.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-07-10 19:35:41 Re: pg_upgrade + Ubuntu
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-07-10 19:10:33 Re: pg_upgrade + Ubuntu