From: | Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: unique constraint with significant nulls? |
Date: | 2012-09-25 16:34:36 |
Message-ID: | CANPAkgucbsK0=UqcZEWmWyterth+r=-exEOKnb32A_tnAF8yag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Interesting, but that assumes there's a value to use in the coalesce that
isn't a valid data value.
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout
Management | RR Donnelley*
1750 Wallace Ave | St Charles, IL 60174-3401
Office: 630.313.7818
Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com
http://www.rrdonnelley.com
<http://www.rrdonnelley.com/>
* <Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>*
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:32 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski <
depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:05:15AM -0500, Mike Blackwell wrote:
> > How would one go about building a multi-column unique constraint where
> null
> > is a significant value, eg. (1, NULL) <> (2, NULL)?
> >
> > I see a number of references to not being able to use an index for this,
> > but no mention of an alternative. Any pointers would be appreciated
>
> create unique index zzz on table ((column is null), coalesce(column,
> 'whatever'));
>
> Best regards,
>
> depesz
>
> --
> The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact
> with it.
>
> http://depesz.com/
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2012-09-25 16:58:05 | Re: unique constraint with significant nulls? |
Previous Message | hartrc | 2012-09-25 16:09:11 | PostgreSQL data loads - turn off WAL |