Re: Speedup twophase transactions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date: 2017-01-27 10:07:46
Message-ID: CANP8+jLwYYZ89gXfFxws9_ngxZZnwQUOEBVBnmECp_1OgPUrow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27 January 2017 at 09:59, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> But, I put the recovery process and the checkpointer process of the
>>> standby under gdb with breakpoints on these functions, but both did
>>> not hit CreateRestartPoint() as well as CheckPointGuts() when I issued
>>> a promote :-|
>>
>> No end-of-recovery checkpoints happen at promotion since 9.3. You can
>> still use fallback_promote as promote file to trigger the pre-9.2 (9.2
>> included) behavior.
>
> Ok, so that means, we also need to fsync out these 2PC XIDs at promote
> time as well for their durability.

Why? The data files haven't been fsynced either at that point.

If there is a bug there it doesn't just affect 2PC.

What sequence of actions would cause data loss?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Sontakke 2017-01-27 11:01:38 Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Previous Message Nikhil Sontakke 2017-01-27 09:59:07 Re: Speedup twophase transactions