Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-05-27 10:13:19
Message-ID: CANP8+jLeSOnbZbfQeNE0pqa6kTUEzrtgr=qs32OmhsQ_B9LdBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27 May 2017 at 09:44, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:

> I am very curious at your results.

We take your bug report on good faith, but we still haven't seen
details of the problem or how to recreate it.

Please post some details. Thanks.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-05-27 10:54:50 Re: ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ..SET PUBLICATION <no name> refresh is not throwing error.
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2017-05-27 08:44:24 Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months