Re: Replication identifiers, take 4

From: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication identifiers, take 4
Date: 2015-04-17 09:04:41
Message-ID: CANP8+jLNByVYJn1Q3scYf-iZ8Q0d4OehzboxP4wnV9roBdqctQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 April 2015 at 09:54, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Hrmpf. Says the person that used a lot of padding, without much
> discussion, for the WAL level infrastructure making pg_rewind more
> maintainable.

Sounds bad. What padding are we talking about?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-04-17 09:05:58 Re: KNN-GiST with recheck
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-04-17 08:54:51 Re: Replication identifiers, take 4