| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Xin Zhang <xzhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Asim Praveen <apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2017-11-24 14:38:39 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jLKD5u-R4aR78_-DKV2Wd1Q8wFNE0nh19wxVkyAX8uXLw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 23 November 2017 at 11:11, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This is older than the bug report of this thread. All those
> indications point out that the patch has *not* been committed. So it
> seems to me that you perhaps committed it to your local repository,
> but forgot to push it to the remote. I am switching back the patch
> status to what looks correct to me "Ready for committer". Thanks.
Yes, that looks like it's my mistake. Thanks for rechecking.
Will commit and backpatch when I get home.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erikjan Rijkers | 2017-11-24 15:08:08 | Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions |
| Previous Message | Oliver Ford | 2017-11-24 14:11:17 | Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions |