Re: SQL conformity regarding SQLSTATE

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL conformity regarding SQLSTATE
Date: 2017-12-20 12:02:29
Message-ID: CANP8+jLG0XdjE=61TzLsbtCW2MbTUmpmJNLeRWv4cpVnDF-H0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On 20 December 2017 at 10:08, Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> wrote:

> Summary: 01008, 03000, 0B000, 39001, F0000, and F0001 do not conform to the
> standard.

The last two are clearly outside the standard anyway.

If you have suggested replacements for the others, please say. Patch
even better. Thanks

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-12-21 01:28:15 Re: SQL conformity regarding SQLSTATE
Previous Message Jürgen Purtz 2017-12-20 10:08:20 Re: SQL conformity regarding SQLSTATE