From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unused(?) field Form_pg_sequence.sequence_name, not updated by seq rename |
Date: | 2015-12-15 07:17:15 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jL0YoR3=oUcVWAKyWw+uLNHaVr6xgiqFX7qEbtN74aU2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 December 2015 at 04:40, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> It gets written as part of the Form_pg_sequence each time we write a
> sequence advance to WAL, but just seems to be a waste of space.
>
Agreed
> Am I missing something obvious or should it just be removed? Or perhaps
> replaced with the sequence's Oid in pg_class, since that'd be quite handy
> for logical decoding of sequences.
>
If the name is wrong then probably other fields are wrong also when we do
ALTER SEQUENCE?
We should add the fields you need, but don't alter anything in
Form_pg_sequence.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2015-12-15 08:35:41 | Check for interrupts in bf and xdes crypt() |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-15 07:13:57 | Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff |