Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?
Date: 2015-11-17 08:53:55
Message-ID: CANP8+jL-w5fZ1fZZkmgJeFd-su3zh-uO_ENCLGG4mcD0YMgXEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 November 2015 at 00:52, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> This patch does seem like a slam dunk, even if I do say so myself

Short and sweet! Looks good.

I would be inclined to add more comments to explain it, these things have a
habit of being forgotten.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message konstantin knizhnik 2015-11-17 09:09:09 Re: Question concerning XTM (eXtensible Transaction Manager API)
Previous Message Vitaly Burovoy 2015-11-17 08:09:18 Re: Extracting fields from 'infinity'::TIMESTAMP[TZ]