From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, chenhj <chjischj(at)163(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock |
Date: | 2019-03-21 20:14:00 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jKsyRSaAxi1TchqFGG1XkeWe-FGeiSgsueFmSVxyf3_eQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 15:18, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:26 PM Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > It's been pointed out to me that 52ac6cd2d0cd70e01291e0ac4ee6d068b69bc478
> > introduced a WAL incompatibility that has not been flagged.
> >
> > In ginRedoDeletePage() we use the struct directly to read the WAL
> record, so if a WAL record was written prior to
> 52ac6cd2d0cd70e01291e0ac4ee6d068b69bc478, yet read by code at
> 52ac6cd2d0cd70e01291e0ac4ee6d068b69bc478 or later then we will have
> problems, since deleteXid will not be set correctly.
> >
> > It seems this should not have been backpatched.
> >
> > Please give your assessment.
>
> Oh, right. This is my fault.
>
> However, I think this still can be backpatched correctly. We can
> determine whether xlog record data contains deleteXid by its size.
> See the attached patch. I haven't test this yet. I'm going to test
> it. If OK, then push.
>
Patch looks like it will work.
I'd prefer to see a tighter test, since the length should either be the old
or new length, no other.
Thanks
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-03-21 20:17:04 | Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs |
Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2019-03-21 20:13:41 | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |