Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Date: 2018-01-16 17:16:44
Message-ID: CANP8+jK_k-+9psfMyR5OFO3Qd7UwhZyvuGQtevJp6do5_Exu1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16 January 2018 at 06:21, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>>
>> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\" has now caught up with upstream
>> server"?
>
> +1.

upstream is what I would have suggested, so +1 here also.

Will commit.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-01-16 17:17:50 Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-01-16 17:10:12 Re: let's not complain about harmless patch-apply failures