From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
Date: | 2018-03-26 15:05:26 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jKUMs7rjkMnx1cD__GWLsE5iiN4XtSXO8eOHCFhpPkYew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 March 2018 at 15:39, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Now that ON CONFLICT patch is in, here are rebased patches. The second patch
> is to add support for CTE (thanks Peter).
>
> Apart from rebase, the following things are fixed/improved:
>
> - Added test cases for column level privileges as suggested by Peter. One
> problem got discovered during the process. Since we expand and track source
> relation targetlist, the exiting code was demanding SELECT privileges on all
> attributes, even though MERGE is only referencing a few attributes on which
> the user has privilege. Fixed that by disassociating expansion from the
> actual referencing.
Good catch Peter.
> - Added a test case for RLS where SELECT policy actually hides some rows, as
> suggested by Stephen in the past
>
> - Added check to compare result relation's and merge target relation's OIDs,
> as suggested by Robert. Simon thinks it's not necessary given that we now
> scan catalog using MVCC snapshot. So will leave it to his discretion when he
> takes it up for commit
No problem with adding the test, its quick to compare two Oids.
> - Improved explanation regarding why we need a second RTE for merge target
> relation and general cleanup/improvements in that area
> I think it will be a good idea to send any further patches as add-on patches
> for reviewer/committer's sake. I will do that unless someone disagrees.
+1
So v25 is the "commit candidate" and we can add other patches to it.
Given recent bugfix/changes I don't plan to commit this tomorrow anymore.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-26 15:09:42 | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-26 14:56:59 | Re: Proposal: http2 wire format |