From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions |
Date: | 2018-05-09 15:20:02 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jKLgw0oGPph7iaVQT4W+MUtu13e7_Rz7_4A05+EkOq4qg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9 May 2018 at 16:15, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 9 May 2018 at 16:10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> Shouldn't the fix be to allow creation of indexes on foreign tables?
>>>>> (Maybe they would be virtual or foreign indexes??)
>>>
>>>> It might be useful to invent the concept of a foreign index, but not
>>>> for v11 a month after feature freeze.
>>>
>>> Yeah. That's a can of worms we can *not* open at this stage.
>>
>> Lucky nobody suggested that then, eh? Robert's just making a joke.
>
> Someone did suggest that. It was you.
Oh, you weren't joking. I think we're having serious problems with
people putting words in my mouth again then.
Please show me where I suggested doing anything for v11?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-05-09 15:33:25 | Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-05-09 15:18:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) |