| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extension support for postgres_fdw |
| Date: | 2015-06-20 16:45:30 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jKAREemyYU9qC+HinrTuSdGU1e-D_dgCxCBNwO+j9HKqQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 June 2015 at 18:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The key question here is whether filtering functions/operators at the
> level of extensions is a good design. It seems to me like a reasonable
> compromise between flexibility and ease of use, but others might see it
> differently.
I like that, but currently we handle things in terms of Schemas. It would
be strange to have differing ways of specifying groups of objects. Maybe
that's not a problem, but we'd probably need to analyse that to make sure
it didn't make things more complex.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-20 16:53:16 | Re: Extension support for postgres_fdw |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-20 16:31:19 | Re: Auto-vacuum is not running in 9.1.12 |