| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Riaan Stander <rstander(at)exa(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performa(dot)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bulk persistence strategy |
| Date: | 2017-05-22 08:27:25 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jJqTu0RkqehMnkABa-LzHA+ysTDAt=xmJ-MK5akvNo1Ug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 22 May 2017 at 09:06, Riaan Stander <rstander(at)exa(dot)co(dot)za> wrote:
>> It sounds like you don't know about anonymous code blocks with DO
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-do.html
>>
>
> Yes I do know about that feature. My first implemented generated an
> anonymous code block, but to my utter dismay once I tried actually doing
> parameter binding from the application it did not work. This seems to be a
> Postgres limitation actually stated in the documentation. The anonymous code
> block is treated as a function body with no parameters.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion though.
Perhaps we should look into parameterisable DO statements.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Riaan Stander | 2017-05-22 09:36:01 | Re: Bulk persistence strategy |
| Previous Message | Riaan Stander | 2017-05-22 08:06:17 | Re: Bulk persistence strategy |