From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |
Date: | 2017-11-29 14:05:35 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jJQ=Nx7uBy5UOPQVbJ+_KmkY67cRjZE3M0wBUC5RMU2DA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25 September 2017 at 22:34, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> > Here is a small patch that skips scanning btree index if no pending
>> > deleted pages exists.
>> > It detects this situation by comparing pages_deleted with pages_free.
>
> It seems to work to prevent needless cleanup scans.
So this leaves us in the situation that
1. Masahiko's patch has unresolved problems
2. Yura's patch works and is useful
Unless there is disagreement on the above, it seems we should apply
Yura's patch (an edited version, perhaps).
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-11-29 14:12:37 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-11-29 13:10:58 | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts |