Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Date: 2017-03-06 03:05:48
Message-ID: CANP8+jJOWUDw=_72Tx7=Urtw2anxdLujEix1txPnELCSuSpD1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6 March 2017 at 00:51, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2017/03/05 16:20, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I notice also that
>> \d+ <tablename>
>> does not show which partitions have subpartitions.
>
> Do you mean showing just whether a partition is itself partitioned or
> showing its partitions and so on (because those partitions may themselves
> be partitioned)? Maybe, we could do the former.

I think \d+ should show the full information, in some form.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2017-03-06 03:12:21 Re: Report the number of skipped frozen pages by manual VACUUM
Previous Message Okano, Naoki 2017-03-06 02:58:25 Re: [WIP] RE: DECLARE STATEMENT setting up a connection in ECPG