| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE with _any_ constraint |
| Date: | 2015-05-21 16:54:24 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jJO-mgLwuphQNfSzEkAWNS1TAY0B8CMwG83o7P0_O0YSg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 May 2015 at 05:49, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> wrote:
> On 19 May 2015 at 21:57, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> It's not clear to me how a single INSERT could cause two or more UPDATEs.
>>
>
>
> CREATE TABLE mytable (
> c1 int NOT NULL,
> c2 int NOT NULL,
> PRIMARY KEY (c1),
> UNIQUE (c2)
>
> );
>
> INSERT INTO mytable (c1, c2) (10, 20);
> INSERT INTO mytable (c1, c2) (11, 21);
> INSERT INTO mytable (c1, c2) (10, 21) ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE .....
>
> Or did you mean from a coding point of view how it would be possible to
> implement?
>
I mean "how could that possibly have useful meaning?".
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-05-21 18:25:50 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE with _any_ constraint |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-05-21 16:51:54 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE with _any_ constraint |