From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Venkata Balaji N <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments |
Date: | 2015-05-21 16:02:02 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jJL1=fPhioRgF6o8vzYe9uwETZzqbYY6PvkzoL8GvX7Hg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 May 2015 at 02:53, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the old behavior, where restartpoints were driven only by time and
> not by volume, was a misfeature.
>
I have no objection to changing that. The main essence of that was to
ensure that a standby could act differently to a master, given different
settings.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-21 16:06:36 | Re: Postgres and TLSv1.2 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-21 15:47:52 | Re: GROUPING |