Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Date: 2017-02-25 20:30:16
Message-ID: CANP8+jJK4NvtLazjM=WCg5c-Zg1HMo7hwphTXwCcukfJ=QuTXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 February 2017 at 16:33, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I'll be happy to review

Patch looks OK so far, but fails on a partition that has partitions,
probably because of the way we test relkind in the call to
StoreCatalogInheritance1().

Please add a test for that so we can check automatically.

Thanks very much.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-02-25 21:14:02 Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-02-25 20:11:12 Re: I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure