| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Damien Clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Bernier <robert7390(at)comcast(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Uber moving towards MySQL |
| Date: | 2016-08-02 19:11:22 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jJ5SJ3HgD-py3_3KV5=TL8uZOCWrGaf3yD7g5VW9BYASQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> So I am that someone, and would be happy to explain that further off-list, but it seems like this is off the table at this point.. Primarily, It was more about having a unified community message coming from us particularly around how we as a community encourage feedback and are willing to learn from it, and to utilize the resources we have available (e.g. mailing lists) to air questions and concerns so we can address them.
Maybe not a fully unified message, but I have at least tried to address this.
Thoughts on Uber's List of Postgres Limitations
http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/thoughts-on-ubers-list-of-postgres-limitations/
I do also see this as a positive thing, allowing us to get publicity
and explain how and why we do things.
Let me know if y'all would like any words or phrases edited.
I've also been working through various design improvements based upon
this feedback.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-08-02 19:16:14 | Re: Uber moving towards MySQL |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2016-08-02 18:26:56 | Re: Uber moving towards MySQL |