Re: Logical Decoding Failover

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Colin Morelli <colin(dot)morelli(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Decoding Failover
Date: 2016-08-10 09:26:40
Message-ID: CANP8+j+vv-x-mc0Z+GNG5Y1TC+YKLQb4ev8no+ez0cZoL7Jx0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10 August 2016 at 09:03, Colin Morelli <colin(dot)morelli(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> That's too bad. Logical decoding is incredibly powerful, but if it
> ultimately comes down to picking between HA or logical decoding the choice
> to use it becomes a lot more difficult.

Agreed.

> Are you saying that logical decoding is receiving a different design in
> 10.0? (For clarify - is 10.0 the next scheduled release after 9.6 - so next
> year?). If so, I'd greatly appreciate any more info you have on the new
> design (even patches if you have them).

A new design for the failover aspect of logical replication will be in 10.0.

Yes, 10.0 is the next release, due 2017.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Farber 2016-08-10 12:54:25 RETURNS TABLE function: ERROR: column reference "word" is ambiguous
Previous Message Colin Morelli 2016-08-10 08:03:30 Re: Logical Decoding Failover