| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Medhavi Mahansaria <medhavi(dot)mahansaria(at)tcs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reg: BULK COLLECT |
| Date: | 2015-05-27 16:21:18 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+j+rLbQBdMnt61MOPeCfZoKUCm1QPZU1KrhmahdbxNqERw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 27 May 2015 at 06:52, Medhavi Mahansaria <medhavi(dot)mahansaria(at)tcs(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> We are using bulk collect to enhance the performance as the data is huge.
>
>
Using BULK COLLECT speeds up retrieving rows into memory, but if the data
is huge that wasn't a great plan anyway, so doing it faster doesn't matter
much.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Kehlet | 2015-05-27 16:27:08 | Re: delaying autovacuum freeze via storage params? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-27 14:30:44 | Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_class_relname_nsp_index" |