Re: plans for PostgreSQL 12

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plans for PostgreSQL 12
Date: 2018-06-04 06:35:23
Message-ID: CANP8+j+oByLkn0gW3fodjX-t9ssqSqZoKx8frDa98Dvk16Hqyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4 June 2018 at 06:08, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> 4. optimization expression without necessity to create snapshots -
> experiments
>
> @4 There are lot of not database expressions in PLpgSQL - like var1 := var1
> + var2 or var1 := var1 + konst. Own calculation needs about 1% of time of
> total expression evaluation time. Almost all time get preparing plan cache,
> preparing snapshot, .. For this case, when no database object is used, we
> don't need use this infrastructure. I would to measure performance impact,
> and testing if these optimizations are interesting or not.

Sounds good. I think this would need to be restricted by operator and
datatype, since in general you won't know if the datatype functions
need a snapshot or not. Immutable functions for the operators ought to
do it, but I think that might not be enough.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-06-04 07:12:49 Re: plans for PostgreSQL 12
Previous Message Rajkumar Raghuwanshi 2018-06-04 05:44:37 Re: New committers announced at PGCon 2018