Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Date: 2017-11-28 15:34:48
Message-ID: CANP8+j+bE+gPJuM_ui3CfDMbUpOf1-fLL4B6QGX+-POqSFAU1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 November 2017 at 02:03, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is a new patch that addresses the previous review comments.
>
> If there are no new comments, I think this might be ready to go.

Is ERRCODE_INVALID_FUNCTION_DEFINITION still appropriate?

Other than that, looks ready to go.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rady, Doug 2017-11-28 15:38:43 PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2017-11-28 15:33:52 Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support