Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date: 2017-10-30 18:07:18
Message-ID: CANP8+j+Wij0NoewRaNA=U6pfz3CxV9AXdBrkvRmGcq+ZiBQxpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30 October 2017 at 18:59, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:

> It is most emphatically *not* just a "small matter of programming".

Please explain in detail the MERGE SQL statements that you think will
be problematic and why.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-10-30 18:08:21 Re: pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-10-30 18:07:03 Re: Linking libpq statically to libssl