Re: Monitoring roles patch

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monitoring roles patch
Date: 2017-03-27 07:51:32
Message-ID: CANP8+j+PPgiOyE7LWYH8ag78qNA43JkbPrrbNtfThVuJg_U-Tg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25 March 2017 at 16:30, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> I believe this and other reasons we've described are exactly why other DBMS' do what we're proposing.

It would help review if you could show some links and give a
commentary on what you think others do, what they get right and what
they get wrong, so we can be sure we are providing something people
actually want and/or expect. POLA needed. I don't want to be reading
various blogs about what those numpties on the Postgres project did in
v10. Thanks

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-27 08:03:48 Re: Logical decoding on standby
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-03-27 07:49:08 Re: free space map and visibility map