| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |
| Date: | 2017-05-26 07:40:36 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+j+MO=LzpWaQt2MBS9xbxjYPafec1y6112nbcKGPo26oww@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 May 2017 at 08:27, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> On 2017-05-26 08:58, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> On 26 May 2017 at 07:10, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>>
>>> - Do you agree this number of failures is far too high?
>>> - Am I the only one finding so many failures?
>>
>>
>> What type of failure are you getting?
>
>
> The failure is that in the result state the replicated tables differ from
> the original tables.
An important point would be note that that this is time dependent.
> I would really like to know it you think that that doesn't amount to
> 'failure'.
Yes, your test has failed.
Even one record on one test is a serious problem and needs to be fixed.
If we can find out what the bug is with a repeatable test case we can fix it.
Could you provide more details? Thanks
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nguyen Le Hoang Kha | 2017-05-26 08:04:20 | Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2017-05-26 07:27:16 | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |