| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast() busted? (was atomic pin/unpin causing errors) |
| Date: | 2016-05-10 19:15:47 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+j+M4=2JU0hmRiAQYTZRhghzwUrqR=bUXEzO5Cz-VmJM=A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 May 2016 at 17:20, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-05-10 12:28:57 +0200, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 10 May 2016 at 09:05, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Is anybody ready with a good defense for SatisfiesToast not doing any
> > > actual liveliness checks?
> > >
> >
> > I provided a patch earlier that rechecks the OID fetched from a toast
> chunk
> > matches the OID requested.
>
> They match in this case, so that's not likely to help with the issue at
> hand?
>
I can see, but I was answering your more general question above with what I
had available.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-05-10 19:41:49 | Re: what to revert |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-05-10 18:51:02 | Re: what to revert |