| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE with _any_ constraint |
| Date: | 2015-05-19 19:11:33 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+j+03k40FjXY9kteUhfDKf8T_bnZNov-9P17fhXLrOUUdA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 May 2015 at 11:49, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> wrote:
> On 19 May 2015 at 16:32, I wrote:
>
>> In the event that the INSERT triggers a constraint that the UPDATE fails
>> to resolve, it will still fail in exactly the same way that running the ON
>> CONFLICT on a specific constraint would fail, so it's not like you gain any
>> extra value from specifying the constraint, is it?
>>
>
> I don't know why I wrote this paragraph, it's just the product of me
> thinking of something else at the same time:
> UPDATE obviously doesn't resolve a conflict as such.
>
>
> Thinking about it more, I suppose if multiple constraints end up
> triggering for the same INSERT, it would require UPDATEs of multiple rows.
> Is that the issue?
>
I'm sure we'll be asked these questions many times.
Can you comment on whether the docs are sufficiently detailed to explain
this answer?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-05-19 19:13:01 | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2015-05-19 19:04:56 | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |