| From: | Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: kilobyte unit spelled "K bytes" |
| Date: | 2019-08-30 00:34:48 |
| Message-ID: | CANNMO+LZktyZuPO5AhvZmH-iE7Ugc-0u4+tBKZoKzeJeFNhZ9g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Although, 3 years passed since then. I constantly see "kiB", "MiB", etc in
many discussions. And some very popular programs already migrated to it.
For example, in Linux, "top" uses "KiB Mem", "KiB Swap".
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:16 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> In the documentation there is a single instance of “K bytes” being used to
> denote kilobytes (kB or kilobyte used everywhere else), which isn’t really
> correct as the k should be lowercased. The attached diff fixes this to
> make it
> consistent with the rest of the documentation. I opted for kilobytes
> rather
> than kB to match the rest of the document in question.
>
> cheers ./daniel
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2019-08-30 08:37:26 | Re: kilobyte unit spelled "K bytes" |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-08-30 00:14:21 | Re: kilobyte unit spelled "K bytes" |