From: | "Podrigal, Aron" <aronp(at)guaranteedplus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Proper way to keep count of statements executed within current transaction |
Date: | 2019-05-24 20:49:04 |
Message-ID: | CANJp-yjQ0G+ww_fMeWdNwYcprwZLQTxSvG8wTu8LKek26MTayQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | psycopg |
Hi
I've seen many libraries using psycopg2 wrapping execution of statements
and in case of connection failure, it reconnects and submits the query
again.
Doing so in every case can lead to unexpected results when the connection
was reset after the first statement within a transaction.
Consider the following:
BEGIN; -- or autocommit = False
SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 1 FOR UPDATE;
-- User code does some processing with the returned value.
-- At this point the the server was restarted and connection is closed
-- The users code submits
UPDATE accounts SET balance = x WHERE id = 1;
-- The UPDATE query fails due to lost connection, so the library code which
wraps the statement reconnects and submits the query again.
My question is, what is the correct way to detect whether any statements
were executed successfully prior to the connection being lost. And decide
whether it is safe to automatically reconnect and resubmit the query ?
--
-
Aron Podrigal
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christophe Pettus | 2019-05-24 20:56:18 | Re: Proper way to keep count of statements executed within current transaction |
Previous Message | Thomas Güttler | 2019-05-20 12:43:19 | Re: Log Stacktrace of current Python Interpreter via PostgreSQL trigger |